Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Michalski vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Michalski 0 - 0 Carabelli
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.05% of points on their second serve, while Carabelli has won 48.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 52.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 54.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.22% and 35.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 57.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 61.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 54.84% of matches played (W/L 34/ 28), with Carabelli winning 66.25% (W/L 53/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 185/ 98), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 291/ 161), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.24% of matches (W/L 16/ 21), where as Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.44% of matches (W/L 47/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.48 while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of 280.7.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 47.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 46.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
395
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
100
Rank
96
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
62% (218-134)
Career Total W/L
63% (320-187)
51% (18-17)
YTD W/L
65% (31-17)
$0
Career Prize Money
$130,440
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Michalski vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Michalski VS Carabelli
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 51% (18/17) | 65% (31/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (42/40) | 60% (65/44) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (391/386) | 53% (573/502) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (15/10) | 66% (29/15) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 105 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 102 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:14 | 1:59:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 331.34 | 243.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1595/2606) | 63% (2216/3502) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (1014/1595) | 67% (1481/2216) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (506/1011) | 48% (619/1286) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (118/250) | 46% (177/381) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1062/2530) | 42% (1474/3484) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (12/14) | 76% (25/8) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 51% (18/35) | 63% (29/46) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (9/12) | 50% (10/20) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 96% (27/26) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 4% (27/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 24% (21/5) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Gastao Elias
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sebastian Gima
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Leopold Zima
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
August Holmgren
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Gastao Elias
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
49 of
106)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Michalski Vs Carabelli Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Michalski are available here and Carabelli photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
